A Word to the Practitioners of Non Scientific Disciplines from a Peer
A Word to the Practitioners of Non Scientific
Disciplines from a Peer
Having your
existence and worth questioned recurrently in life can be a mind numbing and
soul crushing event. When the same happens in the field of academia it is
belittling, embarrassing and intellectually lethal at best. The practitioners
of non-scientific academic disciplines are, now more than ever, being forced to
validate their existence in the academic world, repeatedly, to no avail.
Considering this eventuality to be premeditated on the part of the scientific
community to project their relevance by contrasting it against the “opposing
group” will do no good to anyone. It is time we stopped pointing fingers and
took responsibility for ensuring that our disciplines be made current, in
keeping with the course of the global civilisation’s path ahead to the future.
So, how do we
alter our roles as mute spectators, indulging in stodgy running commentaries on
life altering events from the fringes, to active participants and make our
presence felt by effecting positive influence in both the real and the academic
world? All we have to do is practice what we preach and be more inclusive.
There is no denying that science has taken over our existence. Hence,
scientists have a tremendous say in the way our lives are getting shaped.
However, the pace of the scientific progress is such that the experts involved
do not take it upon themselves to pause and introspect on its consequences to
the present and future, for fear of lagging behind.
This is where
we come to shoulder the burden. Our subjects are equipped with all the
necessary tools to realise this possibility. But the question is, are we as
practitioners aware enough to take up this responsibility. We as a community
have always frowned upon specialisations and have even put up deliberate
resistance to emulating this practice in our respective streams of studies. The
idea is to keep our minds open and not to be encumbered by disciplinary
parochialisms. Though the sentiment does validate the practice to a great
extent, one should also acknowledge the fact that the extent of information
available out there is way more than what one man or woman can master.
The need for
specialisations is especially felt among the doctoral or post- doctoral researchers
more than the undergraduate or the postgraduate students. Diversity in the
curriculum is obviously mandatory in the basic degree courses to ensure a
comprehensive grasp of the subject and prepping them better to channel their
academic interests towards more apposite terrains. But once you attain a
landing, one cannot afford to get distracted by the greener pastures on the
other side. There has always been a practical dimension to all our branches of
studies. So far all we have done is to mildly acknowledge its presence without
wading too deep into its core. Now, I would say, is the time to boldly embrace
it and make informed interventions such that our presence is not ignored as a
mere flicker in the grand scheme of things.
If after reading this article you are in a mood to
judge my observations unfavourably, then know that I speak from my mistakes
that spanned for over a decade than my achievements. If you are still not
convinced, ask yourself this question: if the world were to end tomorrow, will
one of us, with our questionable academic skills, be ever considered important
enough to make it to the ark and be chosen to be a part of the minimum viable
population? If your answer is yes, I have nothing more to say. However, if it
is no, then maybe you should rethink your approach.
Comments